Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2009; 15(1): 55-60
Published online Jan 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.55
Published online Jan 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.55
Drawbacks |
Only preliminary studies have documented the potential benefit of the short-wire systems (all systems) |
Hydraulic exchange technique not plausible with RX system |
Decreased pushability with the open channel design of the RX system |
Inability to flush channel for hydrophilic wire use (RX system) |
Inability to use smaller than 0.035 inch or angled wires when channel is torn after first device exchange (unless device is preloaded) (RX system) |
Deterioration of the device after multiple exchanges (RX, Fusion systems) |
No easy method for insertion of pancreatic stents (all systems) |
No reliable method of locking wire (V-system) |
Looping of wire between the biopsy port and the external locking device (RX, Fusion systems) |
Poor guidewire visibility (V-system) |
Air and bile leakage causing increased soiling of operators (RX, Fusion systems) |
Wires may suspend freely in air after being locked jeopardizing operators (all systems) |
Loss of visibility due to decreased distention of the duodenum (RX, Fusion systems) |
- Citation: Reddy SC, Draganov PV. ERCP wire systems: The long and the short of it. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(1): 55-60
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i1/55.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.55