Comparison of the chloride channel activator lubiprostone and the oral laxative Polyethylene Glycol 3350 on mucosal barrier repair in ischemic-injured porcine intestine

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 14, Issue 39

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

344

HTML

2553

Figures (1-4)

191

Sum=3088

Oct 21, 2008 (publication date) through Oct 2, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Rapid Communication

World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2008; 14(39): 6012-6017
Published online Oct 21, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.6012

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 TER (A) and short circuit current (I_sc) (B) in ischemic porcine ileum treated with lubiprostone and PEG 3350.

Citation: Moeser AJ, Nighot PK, Roerig B, Ueno R, Blikslager AT. Comparison of the chloride channel activator lubiprostone and the oral laxative Polyethylene Glycol 3350 on mucosal barrier repair in ischemic-injured porcine intestine. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(39): 6012-6017
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i39/6012.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.6012