Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2008; 14(32): 5032-5038
Published online Aug 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5032
Published online Aug 28, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5032
Malignant (n = 58) | Benign (n = 10) | P | |
Findings on preoperative imaging | |||
Presence of mass | 56 (97%) | 8 (80%) | 0.10 |
Mean size (range, cm) | 2.5 (0.7-7.0) | 2.6 (1.0-3.7) | 0.62 |
Bismuth classification | |||
Type I, II | 14 | 3 | 0.70 |
Type IIIa/b, IV | 39 | 6 | |
Intrahepatic | 5 | 1 | |
Vascular involvement1 | 21 (36%) | 0 (0%) | 0.03 |
Portal vein | 19 | 0 | |
Hepatic artery | 6 | 0 | |
Lobar atrophy | 10 (17%) | 1 (10%) | 1.00 |
Lymph nodes (> 1 cm) | 12 (21%) | 1 (10%) | 0.67 |
Intra-operative findings | |||
FS performed2 | 57/58 (99%) | 10/10 (100%) | |
FS positive for malignancy | 20/57 (35%) | 0/10 (0%) | 0.03 |
Suspicious3-Not suspicious | 51-7 | 5-5 | |
Type of resection | |||
Local bile duct resection | 17 (29%) | 3 (30%) | |
Concomitant partial hepatectomy | 41 (71%) | 7 (70%) |
- Citation: Kloek JJ, Delden OMV, Erdogan D, Kate FJT, Rauws EA, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, Gulik TMV. Differentiation of malignant and benign proximal bile duct strictures: The diagnostic dilemma. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(32): 5032-5038
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i32/5032.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.5032