Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2008; 14(30): 4763-4770
Published online Aug 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4763
Published online Aug 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4763
Time | Sham group | Control group | Propolis group | Sham vs Control | Sham vs Propolis | Control vs Propolis |
1st day | 214.7 ± 5.50 | 33.8 ± 2.99 | 43.3 ± 1.51 | P = 0.002 | P = 0.002 | P = 0.002 |
3rd day | 43.7 ± 1.86 | 52.7 ± 3.33 | P = 0.002 | P = 0.002 | P = 0.002 | |
7th day | 146.5 ± 6.53 | 179.8 ± 6.71 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | |
14th day | 176.7 ± 4.41 | 200.8 ± 7.19 | P < 0.001 | P = 0.002 | P < 0.001 |
- Citation: Kilicoglu SS, Kilicoglu B, Erdemli E. Ultrastructural view of colon anastomosis under propolis effect by transmission electron microscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(30): 4763-4770
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i30/4763.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.4763