An autopsy case of a primary aortoenteric fistula: A pitfall of the endoscopic diagnosis

doi:10.3748/wjg.14.4701

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 14, Issue 29

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3052)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

326

HTML

2408

Figures (1-6)

318

Sum=3052

Aug 7, 2008 (publication date) through Oct 2, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (21)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Case Report

World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2008; 14(29): 4701-4704
Published online Aug 7, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4701

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Endoscopic image showing a bleeding ulcer in the second part of the duodenum (A), the endoscopic clipping procedure revealing no other bleeding site detected by upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (B), and follow-up gastrointestinal endoscopic view 12 d after hemostatic procedure (C). Only one hemoclip remained on the scar of the duodenal ulcer.

Citation: Ihama Y, Miyazaki T, Fuke C, Ihama Y, Matayoshi R, Kohatsu H, Kinjo F. An autopsy case of a primary aortoenteric fistula: A pitfall of the endoscopic diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(29): 4701-4704
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i29/4701.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.4701