Endorectal ultrasonography versus phased-array magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 14, Issue 22

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

433

HTML

4076

Figures (1-4)

233

Tables (1-4)

178

Sum=4920

Jun 14, 2008 (publication date) through Nov 27, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Clinical Research

World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2008; 14(22): 3504-3510
Published online Jun 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3504

Table 1 Depth of transmural tumor invasion (T staging): Comparison of phased-array MRI and histopathologic findings

MR-T: T staging evaluation by phased-array MRI; p-T: Pathological T staging; No: Number of cases.

Citation: Halefoglu AM, Yildirim S, Avlanmis O, Sakiz D, Baykan A. Endorectal ultrasonography versus phased-array magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(22): 3504-3510
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i22/3504.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.3504