Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2008; 14(2): 286-291
Published online Jan 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.286
Published online Jan 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.286
Table 3 Stepwise evaluation to find out the optimal cutoff point for both CPT and MELD score (%)
Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | |
CPT score | ||||
8 | 96.30 | 20.30 | 35.60 | 92.30 |
9 | 74.00 | 33.00 | 33.60 | 73.60 |
101 | 70.40 | 49.20 | 38.80 | 78.40 |
11 | 66.70 | 52.60 | 39.10 | 77.50 |
12 | 59.30 | 57.60 | 39.00 | 75.60 |
MELD score | ||||
19 | 55.60 | 52.50 | 34.90 | 72.10 |
20 | 55.60 | 57.60 | 37.50 | 73.90 |
212 | 48.20 | 69.50 | 41.20 | 74.60 |
22 | 44.00 | 69.50 | 40.00 | 73.20 |
23 | 44.40 | 76.30 | 46.20 | 75.00 |
- Citation: Attia K, Ackoundou-N’guessan K, N’dri-yoman A, Mahassadi A, Messou E, Bathaix Y, Kissi Y. Child-Pugh-Turcott versus Meld score for predicting survival in a retrospective cohort of black African cirrhotic patients. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(2): 286-291
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i2/286.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.286