Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2008; 14(2): 265-271
Published online Jan 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.265
Published online Jan 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.265
Table 2 Results of esophageal manometry according to the body mass index (mean ± SE)
Body mass index (kg/m2) | P value | |||
< 23 (n = 344) | 23-25 (n = 231) | > 25 (n = 194) | ||
Proximal esophageal amplitude (mmHg) | 59.6 ± 1.7 | 60.1 ± 2.0 | 62.1 ± 2.4 | 0.650 |
Distal esophageal amplitude (mmHg) | 75.1 ± 2.0 | 79.5 ± 2.9 | 90.2 ± 3.1a | < 0.001 |
LES pressure (mmHg) | 20.9 ± 0.4 | 20.3 ± 0.5 | 20.6 ± 0.6 | 0.711 |
LES length (cm) | 3.3 ± 0.0 | 3.3 ± 0.0 | 3.3 ± 0.0 | 0.636 |
Peristalsis (%) | 96.5 ± 0.6 | 95.2 ± 0.8 | 96.1 ± 0.7 | 0.640 |
Manometric diagnosis | 0.440 | |||
Normal | 143 | 80 | 84 | |
Diffuse esophageal spasms | 4 | 1 | 1 | |
Nutcracker esophagus | 16 | 15 | 17 | |
Hypertensive LES | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Ineffective esophageal motility | 103 | 74 | 52 | |
Nonspecific esophageal motility disorder | 76 | 59 | 38 |
- Citation: Choi CW, Kim GH, Song CS, Wang SG, Lee BJ, I H, Kang DH, Song GA. Is obesity associated with gastropharyngeal reflux disease? World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(2): 265-271
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i2/265.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.265