Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2008; 14(15): 2414-2417
Published online Apr 21, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2414
Published online Apr 21, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2414
Variables | PPE (n = 10) | Non PPE (n = 20) | P |
Patient related | |||
Age (yr) | 57.4 ± 13.5 | 57.8 ± 13.1 | 0.94 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 22.2 ± 2.9 | 21.4 ± 3.7 | 0.58 |
ASA status I:II:III | 30:50:20 | 45:50:05 | 0.39 |
Hypoalbuminemia1 | 50 | 25 | 0.23 |
Preoperative CEA (ng/mL) | 36.9 ± 44.7 | 11.5 ± 21.0 | 0.12 |
Tumor related | |||
Stage I:II:III:IV2 | 0:30:60:10 | 20:20:60:0 | 0.30 |
Tumor size (cm) | 6.0 ± 2.2 | 4.8 ± 2.0 | 0.16 |
Location of the tumor | 9.1 ± 3.3 | 9.0 ± 3.0 | 0.93 |
from the anal verge (cm) |
- Citation: Lohsiriwat V, Lohsiriwat D. Comparison of immediate surgical outcomes between posterior pelvic exenteration and standard resection for primary rectal cancer: A matched case-control study. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(15): 2414-2417
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i15/2414.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.2414