Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2008; 14(10): 1514-1520
Published online Mar 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1514
Published online Mar 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1514
Groups | o-ERCP | n-ERCP | P-value |
Successful cannulation (%) | |||
Either of the ducts | 25/25 | 23/25 | 0.510 |
(100) | (92) | ||
Common bile duct | 24/25 | 18/25 | 0.053 |
(96) | (72) | ||
Pancreatic duct | 24/25 | 21/23 | 0.940 |
(96) | (91) | ||
Median time for cannulation, min (%) | 8 | 7 | 0.590 |
(2-24) | (4-20) | ||
Post-procedural hyperamylasemia (%) | 7/25 | 5/23 | 0.870 |
(28) | (22) | ||
Successful ENBD (%) | 20/21 | 13/15 | 0.340 |
(95) | (87) |
- Citation: Mori A, Ohashi N, Maruyama T, Tatebe H, Sakai K, Shibuya T, Inoue H, Takegoshi S, Okuno M. Transnasal endoscopic retrograde chalangiopancreatography using an ultrathin endoscope: A prospective comparison with a routine oral procedure. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(10): 1514-1520
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i10/1514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.1514