Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2008; 14(10): 1514-1520
Published online Mar 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1514
Published online Mar 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1514
Table 1 Patient characteristics and baseline cardiovascular parameters in each group (mean ± SD)
Groups | o-ERCP | n-ERCP | P-value |
Number of patients | 25 | 25 | |
Male/Female | 17/8 | 17/8 | 0.76 |
Median age (range) | 69 (32-89) | 74 (35-85) | 0.07 |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 129 ± 20 | 133 ± 19 | 0.50 |
Pulse rate (/min) | 71 ± 12 | 65 ± 11 | 0.08 |
SpO2 (%) | 99 ± 1.6 | 98 ± 1.6 | 0.35 |
Indication for ERCP (n) | |||
Cholecyst lithiasis | 6 | 2 | |
Choledochus lithiasis | 11 | 10 | |
Cancer | 6 | 10 | 0.50 |
Pancreatitis | 1 | 2 | |
Others | 1 | 1 |
- Citation: Mori A, Ohashi N, Maruyama T, Tatebe H, Sakai K, Shibuya T, Inoue H, Takegoshi S, Okuno M. Transnasal endoscopic retrograde chalangiopancreatography using an ultrathin endoscope: A prospective comparison with a routine oral procedure. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(10): 1514-1520
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i10/1514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.1514