Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2007; 13(8): 1262-1267
Published online Feb 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i8.1262
Table 1 Comparison of peritoneal adhesive grades between experimental and control subgroups within each group
Group Control group (n = 10)
Experimental group (n = 10)
UP
0IIIIIIIV0IIIIIIIV
Group A: sham-operation
2 wk9100010000045.0000.317
4 wk1000009100045.0000.317
Group B: wound-induced adhesion
2 wk054106310014.5000.005
4 wk05500730007.5000.001
Group C: purified talc-induced adhesion
2 wk001360012745.5000.687
4 wk001450004643.0000.547
Group D: vascular ligation-induced adhesion
2 wk044203610018.0000.009
4 wk144105410021.5000.023
Group E: infection-induced adhesion
2 wk00145045105.5000.001
4 wk00154064002.000< 0.001