Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2007; 13(8): 1252-1256
Published online Feb 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i8.1252
Published online Feb 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i8.1252
Table 2 Sensitivity and positive predictive value for MRI and MDCT in detecting small HCC n (%)
| Sensitivity(%) | Positivepredictivevalue (%) | ||||
| ImagingTechnique | ≤1 cm | > 1 cm ≤3 cm | Total | ||
| SHCC | SHCC | SHCC | |||
| n = 20 | n = 23 | n = 43 | n = 43 | ||
| Observer | MDCT | 19 (95.0) | 22 (95.7) | 41 (95.31) | 97.6 |
| 1 | MRI | 17 (85.0) | 22 (95.72) | 39 (90.7) | 90.7 |
| Observer | MDCT | 18 (90.0) | 21 (91.31) | 39 (90.79) | 97.5 |
| 2 | MRI | 14 (70.0) | 22 (95.7) | 36 (83.7) | 94.7 |
- Citation: Zhao H, Yao JL, Wang Y, Zhou KR. Detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison of dynamic enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and multiphase multirow-detector helical CT scanning. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(8): 1252-1256
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i8/1252.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i8.1252