Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: A randomized trial

doi:10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.906

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 13, Issue 6

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (1838)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

232

HTML

1225

Figures (1-1)

205

Tables (1-4)

176

Sum=1838

Feb 14, 2007 (publication date) through Jul 7, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (52)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Rapid Communication

World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2007; 13(6): 906-911
Published online Feb 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.906

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Overall discomfort (A) and overall tolerance (B) at EGD for patients and endoscopists in the three groups of patients. Statistical difference can be observed comparing TN-EGD vs C-EGD.

Citation: Trevisani L, Cifalà V, Sartori S, Gilli G, Matarese G, Abbasciano V. Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: A randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(6): 906-911
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i6/906.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.906