Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2007; 13(6): 906-911
Published online Feb 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.906
Published online Feb 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.906
TN-EGD(n = 41) | TO-EGD(n = 40) | C-EGD(n = 51) | P | |
Endoscopists’ score (mean ± SD) | ||||
Image quality | 87.85 ± 14.34 | 89.57 ± 11.00 | 91.98 ± 11.85 | NS |
Suction | 81.90 ± 9.98 | 84.82 ± 11.82 | 94.37 ± 7.49 | < 0.001 |
Air insufflation/washing of the lens | 83.90 ± 13.70 | 85.80 ± 13.34 | 94.76 ± 6.49 | < 0.001 |
Reaching of the second portionof the duodenum, n (%) | 41 (100) | 40 (100) | 51 (100) | NS |
Adequate biopsy sampling, n (%) | 19/19 (100) | 16/16 (100) | 24/24 (100) | NS |
- Citation: Trevisani L, Cifalà V, Sartori S, Gilli G, Matarese G, Abbasciano V. Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: A randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(6): 906-911
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i6/906.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i6.906