Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2007; 13(40): 5351-5356
Published online Oct 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i40.5351
Published online Oct 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i40.5351
Number of patients | P value | ||
Interrupted suture group (n = 133) | Continuous suture group (n = 170) | ||
Pancreatic fistula | 14 (10.5) | 10 (5.9) | 0.102 |
ISGPF grade | 0.085 | ||
Grade A | 5 (3.8) | 4 (2.4) | |
Grade B | 6 (4.5) | 6 (3.5) | |
Grade C | 3 (2.3) | 0 | |
Major pancreatic fistula | 3 (2.3) | 0 | 0.026 |
Disruption | 1 (0.8) | 0 | |
Daily drainage > 200 cc | 0 | 0 | |
Intra-abdominal abscess | 2 (1.5) | 0 | |
Pseudoaneurysm | 0 | 2 | 0.128 |
Reoperation for pancreatic fistula | 1 (0.8) | 0 | 0.199 |
Hospital mortality | 0 | 0 |
-
Citation: Lee SE, Yang SH, Jang JY, Kim SW. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comparison between the two pancreaticojejunostomy methods for approximating the pancreatic parenchyma to the jejunal seromuscular layer: Interrupted
vs continuous stitches. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(40): 5351-5356 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i40/5351.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i40.5351