Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2007; 13(33): 4467-4472
Published online Sep 7, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i33.4467
Published online Sep 7, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i33.4467
Per protocol analysis | Intention to treat analysis | ||||||
Regimen | No. of patients | Cure rates %(N° of patients) | 95% CI | Cure rates %(N° of patients) | 95% CI | Drop outs | Side effects |
Omeprazole | 80 | 81.0 | 72.0–89.9 | 75.0 | 65.0–84.0 | 6 (7.5) | 1 |
60/74 | 60/80 | ||||||
Lansoprazole | 80 | 90.7 | 84.1–97.2 | 85.0 | 77.0-92.8 | 5 (6.3) | 1 |
68/75 | 68/80 | ||||||
Pantoprazole | 80 | 93.51 | 87.9–99.0 | 90.01 | 83.4-96.5 | 3 (3.8) | 1 |
72/77 | 72/80 | ||||||
Rabeprazole | 80 | 94.62 | 89.4–99.7 | 88.82 | 81.5-95.6 | 5 (6.3) | 1 |
71/75 | 71/80 | ||||||
Total | 320 | 90.0 | 86.6-93.4 | 84.7 | 80.7-88.6 | 19 (5.9) | 4 |
271/301 | 271/320 | (1.4) |
- Citation: Pilotto A, Franceschi M, Leandro G, Scarcelli C, D’Ambrosio LP, Paris F, Annese V, Seripa D, Andriulli A, Di Mario F. Comparison of four proton pump inhibitors for the short-term treatment of esophagitis in elderly patients. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(33): 4467-4472
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i33/4467.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i33.4467