Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2007; 13(32): 4372-4378
Published online Aug 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i32.4372
Figure 3
Figure 3 A: Comparison of the yields of CE and DBE without combination of the two insertion approaches. The yield of CE was significantly higher than that of DBE when the combination of two approaches was not used (fixed model, P = 0.009); B: Comparison of the yields of CE and DBE with the two insertion approaches combined. The yield of DBE with combinatory oral and anal routes was moderately higher than that of CE (random model, P = 0.25).