Premedication with pronase or N-acetylcysteine improves visibility during gastroendoscopy: An endoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized study

doi:10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.444

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 13, Issue 3

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2689)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

437

HTML

1918

Figures (1-2)

179

Tables (1-3)

155

Sum=2689

Jan 21, 2007 (publication date) through Aug 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (55)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Rapid Communication

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2007; 13(3): 444-447
Published online Jan 21, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.444

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of patients

Category	Group A	Group B	Group C	Group D
Number (n)	39	35	34	39
Age (yr)	44.4 ± 14.2	44.1 ± 14.4	47.8 ± 13.9	48.7 ± 16.5
Gender (M:F)	18:21	18:17	16:18	18:21
Indication
Cancer screening	9	9	7	10
Dyspepsia	20	17	18	22
Acid regurgitation	10	9	9	7

No significant difference between each two groups. Group A received dimethylpolysiloxane, group B received dimethylpolysiloxane plus water, group C received pronase, sodium bicarbonate, and dimethylpolysiloxane plus water, and group D received N-acetylcysteine and dimethylpolysiloxane plus water.

Citation: Chang CC, Chen SH, Lin CP, Hsieh CR, Lou HY, Suk FM, Pan S, Wu MS, Chen JN, Chen YF. Premedication with pronase or N-acetylcysteine improves visibility during gastroendoscopy: An endoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(3): 444-447
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i3/444.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.444