Copyright
©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2007; 13(2): 289-293
Published online Jan 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i2.289
Published online Jan 14, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i2.289
Table 1 Distribution of patients according to the final diagnosis and number of patients correctly diagnosed by cytological and histological evaluation of samples obtained by EUS-guided FNA
| Final diagnosis | n | Correctdiagnosisby cytology | Correctdiagnosisby histology | Correct diagnosisby both cytologyand histology |
| Adenocarcinoma | 33 | 24 | 21 | 27 |
| Anaplastic carcinoma | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Small cell lung cancer | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| B cell lymphoma | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Endocrine carcinoma | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Inflammatory process | 24 | 17 | 24 | 24 |
| Total | 62 | 42 | 55 | 56 |
- Citation: Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz E, Lozano-Leon A, Abdulkader I, Larino-Noia J, Antunez J, Forteza J. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13(2): 289-293
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v13/i2/289.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v13.i2.289