Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2006; 12(8): 1300-1302
Published online Feb 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1300
Published online Feb 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1300
Table 1 Effects of emetogens on minks (n = 6, mean±SD)
| Emetogens | Dose(mg/kg) | Latency(min) | Retching(n) | Emesis(n) | Vomitingratio |
| NS | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0/6 |
| Cisplatin | 7.5 | 92.0 ± 21 | 91.5 ± 37 | 12.0 ± 3 | 6/6 |
| NS | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0/6 |
| Apomorphine | 1.6 | 39.4 ± 36 | 28.5 ± 16 | 5.3 ± 1.9 | 6/6 |
| NS | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0/6 |
| Copper sulfate | 40 | 7.0 ± 2.0 | 29.0 ± 9 | 8.7 ± 2.3 | 6/6 |
| Pseudo irradiation | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 0/6 |
| X-ray | 18 Gy | 17.0 ± 4 | 19.3 ± 7 | 10.4 ± 3 | 5/6 |
- Citation: Zhang F, Wang L, Yang ZH, Liu ZT, Yue W. Value of mink vomit model in study of anti-emetic drugs. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(8): 1300-1302
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i8/1300.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1300