Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2006; 12(8): 1273-1277
Published online Feb 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1273
Published online Feb 28, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1273
Table 3 Comparison of patient and control groups by advanced tests (results were given as minimum, maximum and median)
| Test (normal limits) | Patient group (n) | Control group (n) | Significance |
| FVIIa (25.5-96.9 mU/mL) | 27-1232 (96) | 39-325 (129) | NS1 |
| Total TFPI (81.2 ± 30.4 ng/mL) | 22-114 (87.2) | 43-112 (79) | NS |
| Free TFPI (10.0 ± 4.8 ng/mL) | 5-41 (19) | 9-20 (13) | aP < 0.05 |
| sVCAM (395-714 ng/mL) | 489-1890 (915) | 410-890 (517) | cP < 0.05 |
| sICAM (115-306 ng/mL) | 148-400 (252) | 24-260 (164) | bP < 0.05 |
| E-Selectin (29.1-63.4 ng/mL) | 14-68 (20) | 11-64 (29) | NS |
- Citation: Harmanci O, Buyukasik Y, Kirazli S, Balkanci F, Bayraktar Y. Does endothelium agree with the concept of idiopathic hepatic vessel thrombosis. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(8): 1273-1277
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i8/1273.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i8.1273