Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2006; 12(43): 6973-6981
Published online Nov 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i43.6973
Published online Nov 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i43.6973
Studies | Intervention | Patients | OS (d) | 6-mo survival (%) | 1-yr survival (%) | 6-mo TTP/PFS/TTF rate (%) | ORR (CR + PR) % | CBR | Jadad score |
Scheithauer 2003[8] | Gem | 42 | 246 | 59.4 | 37.2 | 24.6 (PFS) | 6/42 | 10/30 | 3 |
Gem + Capecitabine | 41 | 285 | 67.7 | 31.8 | 36.9 | 7/41 | 15/31 | ||
Colucci 2002[9] | Gem | 54 | 140 | 31.5 | 11 | 18 (TTP) | 5/48 | 21/43 | 3 |
Gem + DDP | 53 | 210 | 47 | 11.3 | 28 | 14/45 | 20/38 | ||
Wang XY 2002[10] | Gem | 20 | - | 81.3 | 31.3 | - | 1/16 | 14/16 | 3 |
Gem + DDP | 22 | - | 61.6 | 11.1 | - | 2/18 | 14/20 | ||
Gansauge 2002[11] | Gem | 28 | 144 | 32 | 11 | - | 1/28 | - | 3 |
Gem + NSC-631570 | 28 | 279 | 64 | 29 | - | 6/28 | - | ||
Berlin 2002[12] | Gem | 162 | 162 | 42 | 15.5 | 32/160 (PFS) | 9/162 | - | 3 |
Gem + 5-FU | 160 | 201 | 55 | 21.9 | 41/158 | 11/160 | - | ||
Bramhall 2002[13] | Gem + placebo | 119 | 164 | 43 | 17 | 23 (TTF) | 14/88 | - | 5 |
Gem + marimastat | 120 | 165.5 | 47 | 18 | 29 | 11/97 | - | ||
Cutsem 2004[14] | Gem + placebo | 347 | 182 | 49 | 24 | - | 28/347 | - | 5 |
341 | 193 | 53 | 27 | - | 20/341 | - | |||
Louvet 2005[15] | Gem | 156 | 213 | 60.4 | 27.8 | 27.4 (PFS) | 27/156 | 26.9 | 3 |
Gem1 + Oxaliplatin | 157 | 270 | 68 | 34.7 | 43 | 42/157 | 38.2 | ||
Reilly 2004[16] | Gem | 174 | 186 | 51 | 21 | 27 (TTP) | 9/127 | - | 3 |
Gem + DX-8951f | 175 | 201 | 54 | 23 | 39 | 12/147 | - | ||
Richards 2004[17] | Gem | 282 | 189 | 50.9 | 20.1 | 27.6 (PFS) | 20/220 | - | 3 |
Gem + Pemetrexed | 283 | 186 | 50.9 | 21.4 | 32.1 | 42/230 | - | ||
Li CP 2004[18] | Gem | 25 | 138 | 20.3 | 13.6 | 11.8 (TTP) | 3/25 | 9/25 | 3 |
Gem + DDP | 21 | 168 | 31.1 | 6.3 | 11.8 | 2/21 | 6/21 | ||
Reni 2004[19] | Gem | 47 | - | 63.9 | 21.3 | 12.9 (PFS) | 4/47 | 5/20 | 3 |
Gem + 5-FU + DDP + EPI | 52 | - | 64.6 | 38.5 | 37.4 | 20/52 | 15/23 | ||
Viret 2004[20] | Gem | 41 | 201 | 58.3 | 25.1 | 10 (TTF) | 2/41 | - | 3 |
Gem + DDP | 42 | 241 | 55.5 | 32.4 | 14 | 3/42 | - | ||
Rocha Lima 2004[21] | Gem | 180 | 198 | 52.9 | 22 | 21.9 (TTP) | 8/180 | - | 3 |
Gem + Irinotecan | 180 | 189 | 50.7 | 21 | 30.6 | 29/180 | - | ||
Costanzo 2001[22] | Gem | 49 | 217 | 59 | 14.5 | - | 4/48 | - | 3 |
Gem + 5-FU | 44 | 210 | 59 | 23.3 | - | 5/43 | - | ||
Heinemann 2003[23] | Gem | 97 | 180 | 48.6 | 22.5 | 25.6 (TTP) | 8/93 | - | 3 |
Gem + DDP | 95 | 228 | 59.4 | 27.5 | 39.3 | 10/92 | - | ||
Kulke 2004[24] | Gem2 | 45 | - | 24/45 | - | - | - | - | 3 |
Gem + DDP | 45 | - | 23/45 | - | - | - | - | ||
Gem + Docetaxel | 49 | - | 22/49 | - | - | - | - | ||
Gem + Irinotecan | 44 | - | 21/44 | - | - | - | - | ||
Richards 2002[25] | Gem + Placebo | 88 | 213 | 62.9 | 20.4 | 25.9 (TTF) | 5/63 | - | 5 |
Gem + CI-994 | 86 | 191 | 60.8 | 18.5 | 16.7 | 1/61 | - | ||
Moore 2005[26] | Gem + Erlotinib | 285 | 191 | 58 | 24 | 32 (PFS) | 23/268 | - | 5 |
Gem + placebo | 284 | 177 | 49 | 17 | 25 | 21/262 | - | ||
Stathopoulos 2005[27] | Gem | 70 | 195 | 50 | 21.82 | - | 7/70 | - | 3 |
Gem + Irinotecan | 60 | 192 | 60 | 24.29 | - | 9/60 | - | ||
Riess 2005[28] | Gem | 236 | 186 | 53 | 20 | 30 (TTP) | 17/236 | - | 3 |
Gem + 5-FU/CF | 230 | 175.5 | 49 | 20 | 29 | 11/230 | - | ||
Herrmann 2005[29] | Gem | 157 | 219 | 62 | 27 | 42 (PFS) | 12/1523 | - | 3 |
Gem + Capecitabine | 159 | 252 | 60 | 31 | 42 | 15/148 | - |
- Citation: Xie DR, Liang HL, Wang Y, Guo SS, Yang Q. Meta-analysis on inoperable pancreatic cancer: A comparison between gemcitabine-based combination therapy and gemcitabine alone. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(43): 6973-6981
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i43/6973.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i43.6973