Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2006; 12(39): 6331-6338
Published online Oct 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i39.6331
Published online Oct 21, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i39.6331
Warren[5] | Terés[7] | Rikkers[6] | Our data | |
2-yr survival rate | ||||
after DSRS | 59%a | 71% | 65% | 95% |
2-yr survival rate | ||||
after ES | 84%a | 68% | 61% | 85% |
Child's C patients | 43% | 0 | 33% | 0 |
Interval between bleeding | ||||
and treatment (d) | > 3-5 | 10-15 | NR | 901 |
Rebleeding rate after | ||||
DSRS | 3%a | 14%a | 19%a | 2.5%a |
Rebleeding rate after | ||||
ES | 53%a | 37%a | 57%a | 35%a |
Variceal eradication | ||||
rate | NR | 46% | 63% | 90% |
Failure to salvage | ||||
rebleeders | 17% | 33% | 47% | 14% |
Shunt for ES failure | 31% | 6% | 7% | 5% |
Global mortality rate | ||||
due to rebleeding | 3% | 14% | 27% | 16% |
Global mortality rate | ||||
due to other causes | 13% | 16% | 13% | 17% |
- Citation: Santambrogio R, Opocher E, Costa M, Bruno S, Ceretti AP, Spina GP. Natural history of a randomized trial comparing distal spleno-renal shunt with endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal rebleeding: A lesson from the past. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(39): 6331-6338
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i39/6331.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i39.6331