Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2006; 12(34): 5536-5539
Published online Sep 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i34.5536
Published online Sep 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i34.5536
Segment | Senna (mean ± SD) | NaP (mean ± SD) | 95% CI of differences |
Rectum | 7.9 ± 1.7 | 8.3 ± 1.5 | - 1.0 to 0.1 |
Sigmoid colon | 8.0 ± 1.8 | 8.5 ± 1.4 | - 1.0 to 0.1 |
Descending colon | 7.9 ± 2.0 | 8.5 ± 1.3 | - 1.2 to 0.0 |
Transverse colon | 7.9 ± 2.0 | 8.2 ± 1.4 | - 0.9 to 0.3 |
Ascending colon and cecum | 7.2 ± 1.7 | 6.9 ± 1.4 | - 0.2 to 0.8 |
Acceptance score | |||
Taste | 8.6 ± 1.9 | 5.1 ± 2.8 | P < 0.001 |
Side effects | |||
Nausea & vomiting | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 3.0 ± 3.5 | P < 0.001 |
Abdominal pain | 1.3 ± 2.3 | 1.4 ± 2.4 | P = 0.8 |
Vertigo | 0.7 ± 1.6 | 1.3 ± 2.3 | P = 0.08 |
Sleeplessness | 1.2 ± 2.7 | 1.4 ± 2.5 | P = 0.65 |
Adverse event | 2:67 | 2:64 |
- Citation: Kositchaiwat S, Suwanthanmma W, Suvikapakornkul R, Tiewthanom V, Rerkpatanakit P, Tinkornrusmee C. Comparative study of two bowel preparaton regimens for colonoscopy: Senna tablets vs sodium phosphate solution. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(34): 5536-5539
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i34/5536.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i34.5536