Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 12, Issue 26

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

302

HTML

1707

Tables (1-4)

147

Sum=2156

Jul 14, 2006 (publication date) through Aug 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Rapid Communication

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2006; 12(26): 4199-4202
Published online Jul 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4199

Table 3 Results of bacterial contamination after gastroscope reprocessing in both groups

	Enzymaticdetergent(n = 130)	Chlorhexidine(n = 130)	P
Type of endoscope (Olympus:Pentax)	60:70	60:70
Positive culture (> 200 cfu/mL)	6 (4.6%)	4 (3.1%)	0.747^a
Single organism	5 (3.8%)	1 (0.8%)	0.213^b
Mixed organism	1 (0.8%)	3 (2.3%)	0.622^b
Pseudomonas aeruginosa	4 (3.1%)	5 (3.8%)	1.000^b
Non Pseudomonas spp.	3 (2.3%)	3 (2.3%)	1.000^b

a: chi square test; b: Fisher’s exact test.

Citation: Rerknimitr R, Eakthunyasakul S, Nunthapisud P, Kongkam P. Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(26): 4199-4202
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i26/4199.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4199