Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2006; 12(26): 4199-4202
Published online Jul 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4199
Published online Jul 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4199
Gastroscope reprocessing |
Cleaning After completion of the cleaning procedure, the inserted tube was wiped with a wet cloth and soaked in detergent solution (chlorhexidine or 3E-ZYME). Detergent solution was suctioned through the biopsy channel until the solution was visibly clean. |
While the scope was submerged, mechanical cleaning was performed by washing all debris from the exterior. All removable parts were separately cleaned. A soft cleaning brush was used to clean all accessible channels. Manual cleansing was done for 10 min. |
The scope was removed from the detergent solution and then submerged in 5 L of filtered water. An all-channel irrigator was used to flush water through it. |
Leak testing of the scope was performed. |
Disinfection After manual cleaning, the gastroscope underwent high-level disinfection in a container using 2% glutaraldehyde with a 20-min soak time. |
The scope was removed from 2% glutaraldehyde and then submerged in 5 L of filtered water. An all-channel irrigator was used to flush water through it. |
Rinsing and Drying The suction/biopsy channel was rinsed with 70% alcohol 20 mL and dried for 5 min. |
The suction/biopsy channel was sampled using the flush method. |
- Citation: Rerknimitr R, Eakthunyasakul S, Nunthapisud P, Kongkam P. Results of gastroscope bacterial decontamination by enzymatic detergent compared to chlorhexidine. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(26): 4199-4202
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i26/4199.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4199