Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2006; 12(26): 4170-4174
Published online Jul 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170
Published online Jul 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170
Groups | n | Follow-uppatients(n, %) | Postoperativecholangitis(n, %) | Causes of cholangitis | |||
ST | SR | SRE | RC | ||||
HJ group | 123 | 96 (78.0) | 23 (24.0) | 3 | 16 | (3)4 | 1 |
+ hepatectomy (A1) | 76 | 59 (77.6) | 13 (22.0) | 1 | 9 | 3 | 0 |
+ CBD exploration (A2) | 47 | 37 (78.7) | 10 (27.0) | 2 | 7 | (2)3 | 1 |
T tube drainage group | 191 | 145 (76.0) | 35 (24.1) | 0 | 1 | 34 | 0 |
+ hepatectomy (B1) | 85 | 61 (71.8) | 5 (8.2)1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
+ CBD exploration (B2) | 106 | 84 (79.2) | 30 (35.7)2 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 0 |
- Citation: Li SQ, Liang LJ, Peng BG, Lai JM, Lu MD, Li DM. Hepaticojejunostomy for hepatolithiasis: A critical appraisal. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(26): 4170-4174
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i26/4170.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i26.4170