Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 28, 2005; 11(8): 1172-1178
Published online Feb 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i8.1172
Published online Feb 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i8.1172
Operated patients (n = 21) | Healthy controls (n = 18) | |||||||
Preprandial | Postprandial | Preprandial | Postprandial | |||||
Total | Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | Total | Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | |||
Contractions | 2.16±1.66 | 2.24±2.01 | 2.03±0.93 | 2.19±1.85 | 2.14±2.28 | 2.26±0.97 | 2.2±0.71 | 2.36±0.731 |
Electromechanical fraction | 68.7±19.4 | 67.5±22.5 | 70.5±15.8 | 62.5±31.0 | 54.2±32.3 | 76.0±24.8 | 78.2±17.6 | 75.8±18.7 |
- Citation: Izbéki F, Wittmann T, Ódor S, Botos B, Altorjay &. Synchronous electrogastrographic and manometric study of the stomach as an esophageal substitute. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(8): 1172-1178
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i8/1172.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i8.1172