Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2005; 11(6): 823-830
Published online Feb 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i6.823
Published online Feb 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i6.823
Group | Number ofanimals (n) | Route ofadministration | Dosage (mg/kg) | Fluorescencepolarization (P) | Micro viscosity, h(P) | Membrane lipidfluidity (LFU) |
Control | 10 | 0.2006±0.0728 | 1.7557±0.9616 | 7.4478±2.3273 | ||
Saline | 10 | Ip | Equal volume | 0.2430±0.03017 | 2.1378±0.6186 | 4.3559±1.4051 |
5Fu | 10 | Ip | 25 | 0.2275±0.0182 | 1.9760±0.6738 | 5.2606±1.5472 |
Haimiding | 10 | Ip | 100 | 0.2331±0.0211 | 2.0819±0.1772 | 4.9153±1.5360 |
Haimiding | 10 | Ip | 50 | 1.2775±0.4164b | 11.0370±3.4489b | 0.1770±0.0567b |
Haimiding | 10 | Ip | 25 | 0.2111±0.0223a | 1.8176±0.2106 | 6.4776±2.0895a |
- Citation: Ji YB, Gao SY, Cheng WP. Effect of Haimiding on the functioning of red cell membrane of FC and H22 tumor-bearing mice. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(6): 823-830
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i6/823.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i6.823