Basic Research
Copyright ©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2005; 11(48): 7615-7619
Published online Dec 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i48.7615
Table 3 Comparison of identifications based on hybridization assay and conventional methods for 26 cultures
No.Hybridization assayConventional methodsConsistency
1Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureusY1
2Coagulase-negative StaphylococcusStaphylococcus epidermidisY
3Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureusY
4Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureusY
5Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureusY
6Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas aeruginosaY
7-3Salmonella typhimurium-2
8Escherichia coliEscherichia coliY
9Staphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus aureusY
10Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas aeruginosaY
11Shigella sp.Shigella flexneriY
12Shigella sp.Shigella flexneriY
13Shigella sp.Shigella flexneriY
14Shigella sp.Shigella flexneriY
15Vibrio parahaemolyticusVibrio parahaemolyticusY
16Yersinia enterocoliticaYersinia enterocoliticaY
17Pseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas aeruginosaY
18Shigella sp.Shigella flexneriY
19Shigella sp.Shigella flexneriY
20Vibrio parahaemolyticusVibrio parahaemolyticusY
21Escherichia coliEscherichia coliY
22Escherichia coliEscherichia coliY
23Salmonella sp.Salmonella typhimuriumY
24Campylobacter jejuniCampylobacter jejuniY
25Salmonella sp.Salmonella typhimuriumY
26Salmonella sp.Salmonella typhimuriumY