Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2005; 11(47): 7486-7493
Published online Dec 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7486
Published online Dec 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7486
Group | Excellent (%) | Good (%) | Fair (%) | Poor (%) | χ2M–HP | Good/excellent (%) | P |
Overall | |||||||
NaP (n = 38) | 22 (57.9) | 8 (21.1) | 8 (21.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0.648 | 30 (78.9) | 0.7781 |
PEG (n = 40) | 22 (55.0) | 11 (27.5) | 3 (7.5) | 4 (10.0) | 33 (82.5) | ||
Complete | 100 | 0.5842 | 0.3212 | ||||
NaP (n = 32) | 19 (59.4) | 7 (21.9) | 6 (18.8) | 0 (0.0) | 26 (81.3) | ||
PEG (n = 11) | 8 (72.7) | 2 (18.2) | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (90.9) | ||
Incomplete | 0-99 | ||||||
NaP (n = 6) | 3 (50.0) | 1 (16.7) | 2 (33.3) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (66.7) | ||
PEG (n = 29) | 14 (48.3) | 9 (31.0) | 2 (6.9) | 4 (13.8) | 23 (79.3) |
- Citation: Hwang KL, Chen WTL, Hsiao KH, Chen HC, Huang TM, Chiu CM, Hsu GH. Prospective randomized comparison of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol lavage for colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(47): 7486-7493
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i47/7486.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i47.7486