Clinical significance of CT-defined minimal ascites in patients with gastric cancer

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 42

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

315

HTML

2658

Figures (1-2)

213

Tables (1-7)

179

Sum=3365

Nov 14, 2005 (publication date) through Jul 28, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Gastric Cancer

World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2005; 11(42): 6587-6592
Published online Nov 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i42.6587

Table 7 Peritoneal carcinomatosis in the patients with CT-defined, yet preoperatively malignancy-undetermined ascites. Univariate analysis

Peritoneal carcinomatosis Significance Predictive value
	Negative	Positive
CT-defined enlarged lymph node (L/N)
None or Regional L/N	24	3		NPV: 88.9%¹
Distant L/N	6	7	P<0.01
CT-defined perigastric invasion
Negative	20	2		NPV: 90.9%
Positive	10	8	P<0.05
Tumor size defined by endoscopy or UGIS
<3 cm	10	0		NPV: 100%
3-10 cm	16	6
>10 cm	4	4	P<0.05
EGC vs AGC²
EGC	7	0		NPV: 100%
AGC	23	10	NS

¹NPV: negative predictive value for peritoneal carcinomatosis. ²EGC: early gastric cancer; AGC: advanced gastric cancer.

Citation: Chang DK, Kim JW, Kim BK, Lee KL, Song CS, Han JK, Song IS. Clinical significance of CT-defined minimal ascites in patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(42): 6587-6592
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i42/6587.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i42.6587