Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2005; 11(4): 600-604
Published online Jan 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i4.600
Published online Jan 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i4.600
Table 2 Hepatic prooxidant and antioxidant status in groups.
| Control (Group 1) | ETOH (Group 2) | ETOH + L-NAME (Group 3) | P1 | P2 | P3 | |
| MDA (nmol/mg protein) | 0.34±0.05 | 0.55±0.08 | 0.36±0.07 | <0.001 | <0.001 | NS |
| NO (nmol /mg protein) | 435.33±35.64 | 586.50±34.79 | 412.75±38.67 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| SOD (U/mg protein) | 8.13±0.79 | 5.38±0.75 | 6.93±0.81 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.01 |
| CAT (U/mg protein) | 72.58±7.37 | 36.50±6.65 | 61.17±7.81 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.01 |
| GSH (nmol/mg protein) | 4.49±0.51 | 3.55±0.36 | 4.18±0.26 | <0.001 | <0.001 | NS |
- Citation: Uzun H, Simsek G, Aydin S, Unal E, Karter Y, Yelmen NK, Vehid S, Curgunlu A, Kaya S. Potential effects of L-NAME on alcohol-induced oxidative stress. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(4): 600-604
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i4/600.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i4.600