Brief Reports
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2005; 11(36): 5710-5713
Published online Sep 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i36.5710
Table 3 Comparison of clinical data for cholelithiasis patients and healthy controls
Cholelithiasis patients (n = 372)
Control group (n = 293)
P (χ2 test )(for age by student’s t test)
n%n%
Gender (M/F)157/215135/158NS
Age (yr, mean±SD)53.0±14.951.5±10.6NS
UGT1A1 genotype
Wild type18048.414348.8NS
Heterozygous variation in promoter area (6/7)6016.16020.5NS
Heterozygous variation within
coding region9625.86421.8NS
211 G→A/normal8957
1 091 C→T/normal67
1 456 T→G/normal1
Compound heterozygous variation205.4237.9NS
6/7, 211 G→A/normal104
6/7, 686 C→A/normal814
6/7, 1 091 C→T/normal1
6/7, 211 G→A/normal, 686 C→A/ normal1
6/7, 686 C→A/normal, 1 091 C→T/normal11
211 G→A/normal, 1 091 C→T/ normal11
Homozygous variation164.3310.012
7/75
211 G→A /G→A43
7/7, 686 C→A /normal70
G6PD deficiency102.772.4NS
Thalassemia195.1155.1NS