Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2005; 11(3): 319-322
Published online Jan 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i3.319
Published online Jan 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i3.319
References | Cases (n) | With DMS (n) | Frequency of DMS (%) | Pattern of DMS | Maximum extent of DMS (cm) | Suggested DCM (cm) |
Heald et al.[12] | - | 5 | - | ly, vi, LN | 4 | TME |
Williams et al.[19] | 50 | 3 | 6 | LN | 1.3 | <5 |
Scott et al.[10] | 20 | 4 | 20 | ly, D | 3 | 3 to 5 |
Shirouzu et al.[20] | 610 | 44 | 7.2 | ly, D, LN | ≤2 | 1 |
Reynolds et al.[7] | 50 | 12 | 24 | LN, foci | 5 | TME |
Hida et al.[21] | 198 | 40 | 20.2 | LN | 4 | 2 cm (lower rectal cancer) |
Tocci et al.[11] | 53 | 19 | 35.1 | LN, foci | - | TME |
Ono et al.[5] | 40 | 3 | 7.5 | LN | 2.4 | 3 |
- Citation: Zhao GP, Zhou ZG, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Wang C, Wang Z, Zheng XL, Wang R. Pathological study of distal mesorectal cancer spread to determine a proper distal resection margin. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(3): 319-322
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i3/319.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i3.319