Copyright
©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2005; 11(26): 4067-4077
Published online Jul 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.4067
Published online Jul 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.4067
4-wk | 8-wk | ||||||||
I | II | III | IV | I | II | III | IV | ||
Number of arms | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |
sd PPIs | Pooled data | 195/239 | 302/362 | 148/210 | 3/7 | 214/235 | 329/360 | 175/209 | 2/4 |
Pooled rate (%) | 81.6 | 83.4 | 70.5 | 42.9 | 91.1 | 91.4 | 83.7 | 50.0 | |
sd omeprazole | Pooled data | 190/238 | 315/393 | 132/195 | 3/5 | 214/233 | 345/390 | 159/188 | 1/2 |
Pooled rate (%) | 79.8 | 80.2 | 67.8 | 60.0 | 91.8 | 88.5 | 84.6 | 50.0 | |
Summary RR | 1.022 | 1.041 | 1.041 | 0.733 | 0.992 | 1.033 | 0.990 | 1.000 | |
95%CI | 0.936-1.116 | 0.973-1.113 | 0.914-1.186 | 0.250-2.147 | 0.938-1.048 | 0.985-1.084 | 0.927-1.057 | 0.213-4.694 |
- Citation: Wang WH, Huang JQ, Zheng GF, Xia HHX, Wong WM, Lam SK, Wong BCY. Head-to-head comparison of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of erosive esophagitis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(26): 4067-4077
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i26/4067.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.4067