Copyright
©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2005; 11(26): 4067-4077
Published online Jul 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.4067
Published online Jul 14, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.4067
3-wk | 4-wk | 6-wk | 8-wk | 12-wk | ||
Number of comparisons | 1 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 12 | |
High dose | Pooled data | 29/169 | 297/669 | 607/1 294 | 413/669 | 1 142/1 729 |
Pooled healing rate (%) | 17.2 | 44.4 | 46.9 | 61.7 | 66.0 | |
Standard dose | Pooled data | 33/168 | 198/573 | 584/1 361 | 309/573 | 920/1 520 |
Pooled healing rate (%) | 19.6 | 34.6 | 42.9 | 53.9 | 60.5 | |
Summary RR | 0.874 | 1.281 | 1.096 | 1.165 | 1.084 | |
95% CI | 0.557-1.371 | 1.036-1.583 | 0.930-1.293 | 1.020-1.329 | 1.019-1.152 |
- Citation: Wang WH, Huang JQ, Zheng GF, Xia HHX, Wong WM, Lam SK, Wong BCY. Head-to-head comparison of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of erosive esophagitis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(26): 4067-4077
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i26/4067.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i26.4067