Diagnosis of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Which is the best tool?

doi:10.3748/wjg.v11.i19.2945

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 11, Issue 19

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2821)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

312

HTML

2167

Figures (1-2)

156

Tables (1-3)

186

Sum=2821

May 21, 2005 (publication date) through Aug 29, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (54)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Clinical Research

World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2005; 11(19): 2945-2948
Published online May 21, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i19.2945

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Comparison of ERC and MRC in posttransplant biliary stenosis. ITBL type III with hilar stenosis (arrow) and multiple peripheral duct stenoses. Left: MRC, right: ERC. The dominant hilar stenosis (arrow) is seen with both methods. The peripheral stenoses are better seen in ERC.

Citation: Zoepf T, Maldonado-Lopez EJ, Hilgard P, Dechêne A, Malago M, Broelsch CE, Schlaak J, Gerken G. Diagnosis of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: Which is the best tool? World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(19): 2945-2948
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i19/2945.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i19.2945