Copyright
©2005 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2005; 11(16): 2522-2525
Published online Apr 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2522
Published online Apr 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2522
Table 1 Composition of UW and CMU-1 solutions.
| Substrate (mmol/L) | UW | CMU-1 |
| Na+ | 30 | 125 |
| K+ | 125 | 25 |
| H2PO4- | 25 | 25 |
| Lactobionate | 100 | 100 |
| Raffinose | 30 | 25 |
| Hydroxyl-ethyl-starch | 50 g/L | - |
| Dextran-40 | - | 50 g/L |
| Histidine | - | 60 |
| Adenosine | 5 | - |
| Allopurinol | 1 | - |
| Glutathione | 3 | - |
| Insulin | 100 IU/L | - |
| Dexamethasone | 8 | - |
| pH | 7.4±0.2 | 7.4±0.2 |
| Osmolarity | 320 mosm/L | 340 mosm/L |
| Viscosity | 7.5 mpas | 5.2 mpas |
- Citation: Cheng Y, Liu YF, Cheng DH, Li BF, Zhao N. Evaluation of CMU-1 preservation solutions using an isolated perfused rat liver model. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(16): 2522-2525
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v11/i16/2522.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i16.2522