Copyright
©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 1, 2004; 10(3): 427-432
Published online Feb 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i3.427
Published online Feb 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i3.427
Table 2 Comparison of serum CA19-9 and CEA levels in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and benign biliary diseases
CA19-9△ | CA19-9 | CEA | CA19-9 or CEA | CA19-9 and CEA | |
Sensitivity(true positive)* | 65.71%(23/35) | 77.14%(27/35)a | 68.57%(24/35) | 91.43%(32/35) | 62.86%(22/35) |
Specificity(true negative)** | 88.04%(81/92) | 84.78%(78/92) | 81.52%(75/92) | 76.09%(70/92) | 86.96%(80/92) |
Positive predictive value | 67.65%(23/34) | 65.85%(27/41) | 58.54%(24/41) | 59.26%(32/54) | 64.71%(22/34) |
Negative predictive value | 87.10%(81/93) | 90.70%(78/86) | 87.21%(75/86) | 95.89%(70/73) | 88.89%(80/90) |
Accuracy | 81.89%(104/127) | 82.68%(105/127) | 77.95%(99/127) | 80.31%(102/127) | 80.31%(102/127) |
False positive rate | 11.98%(11/92) | 15.22%(14/92) | 18.48%(17/92) | 23.91%(22/92) | 13.04%(12/92) |
- Citation: Qin XL, Wang ZR, Shi JS, Lu M, Wang L, He QR. Utility of serum CA19-9 in diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: In comparison with CEA. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(3): 427-432
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i3/427.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i3.427