Clinical Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 15, 2004; 10(2): 279-283
Published online Jan 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i2.279
Figure 4
Figure 4 A: The expression of bcl-xL in 70% hepatectomized (PH) and sham (SH) groups shown in 1. 2 % agarose gel. B: The quantitated expression of bcl-xL in 70% PH (__·__) or sham (__o__) groups. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM of triplicate animals with n=3 rats per time point. The expressions were quantitated with the expression of cyclophilin for each sample and analyzed using the Multi-Analyst software. The expres-sion at “time 0” denoted the quantitated expression of bcl-xL in normal liver and was accepted as “1”. Comparing the mean values at each time points, no difference in bcl-xL values be-tween PH and SH groups was found.