Copyright
©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 15, 2004; 10(16): 2412-2414
Published online Aug 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2412
Published online Aug 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2412
Findings based on complaints of | Group A | Group B | P |
Pruritus ani | 7 (7%) | 32 (32%) | 0.0008 |
Anal pain and irritation | 5 (5%) | 26 (26%) | 0.0011 |
Discharge per anus | 2 (2%) | 34 (36%) | 0.0005 |
Sense of incomplete evacuation | 5 (5%) | 22 (22%) | 0.0008 |
Crawling sensation in anus | 8 (8%) | 48 (48%) | 0.0002 |
Pricking or foreign body sensation in anus | 3 (3%) | 32 (32%) | 0.0006 |
Prolapsed per rectum | Nil | 4 (4%) | N |
Sepsis in the wound | 1 (1%) | 8 (8%) | 0.0044 |
Recurrence of papillae or polyps | Nil | Not applicable | N |
Recurrence of fissure | Nil | Nil | N |
Overall satisfaction from the procedures | 89% | 64% | 0.0004 |
- Citation: Gupta PJ. Hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps, should they be removed during anal fissure surgery? World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(16): 2412-2414
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i16/2412.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i16.2412