Comparison of three PCR methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA and detection of cagA gene in gastric biopsy specimens

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 10, Issue 13

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

495

HTML

2998

Tables (1-3)

206

Sum=3699

Jul 1, 2004 (publication date) through Nov 30, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Reports

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 1, 2004; 10(13): 1958-1960
Published online Jul 1, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i13.1958

Table 3 Positive and negative predictive values of three dif-ferent PCR methods

Value	Results [(%, No. of samples with value/total No.)] for PCR method
Value	ureA gene	glmM gene	26-kDa gene
Positive predictive¹	91 (10/11)	91 (10/11)	100 (11/11)
Negative predictive²	44 (23/52)	56 (29/52)	67 (35/52)

¹Compared with 11 culture- positive samples,

²Compared with 52 culture- negative samples.

Citation: Smith S, Oyedeji K, Arigbabu A, Cantet F, Megraud F, Ojo O, Uwaifo A, Otegbayo J, Ola S, Coker A. Comparison of three PCR methods for detection of Helicobacter pylori DNA and detection of cagA gene in gastric biopsy specimens. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(13): 1958-1960
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i13/1958.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i13.1958