Copyright
©The Author(s) 2004.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 15, 2004; 10(12): 1785-1788
Published online Jun 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i12.1785
Published online Jun 15, 2004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i12.1785
ATP | ADP | AMP | TAN | |
Group 1 (n = 3) | 7.26 ± 0.5513 | 3.33 ± 0.20 | 1.49 ± 0.34 | 11.43 ± 1.3723 |
Group 2 (n = 5) | 5.86 ± 0.52 | 1.01 ± 0.21 | 1.51 ± 0.26 | 7.93 ± 1.30 |
Group 3a (n = 6) | 5.28 ± 0.37 | 1.31 ± 0.35 | 1.55 ± 0.35 | 8.02 ± 0.78 |
Group 3b (n = 6) | 4.74 ± 0.41 | 2.01 ± 0.31 | 1.04 ± 0.24 | 7.36 ± 0.78 |
Group 3c (n = 6) | 2.18 ± 0.21 | 0.83 ± 0.19 | 0.81 ± 0.23 | 4.04 ± 0.51 |
Group 3d (n = 4) | 2.11 ± 0.17 | 0.86 ± 0.21 | 1.04 ± 0.25 | 3.33 ± 0.27 |
- Citation: Yuan CH, Li GC, Zhang H, Cheng Y, Zhao N, Liu YF. Evaluation of the viability and energy metabolism of canine pancreas graft subjected to significant warm ischemia damage during preservation by UW solution cold storage method. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10(12): 1785-1788
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i12/1785.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v10.i12.1785