Review
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2011; 17(46): 5059-5074
Published online Dec 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i46.5059
Figure 1
Figure 1 (18F) 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography image of a patient with a proximal gastric cancer and occult liver metastasis. The liver lesion was not identified on the corresponding staging computed tomography.
Figure 2
Figure 2 (18F) 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography detects diffuse bony metastases not seen on staging computed tomography.
Figure 3
Figure 3 (18F) 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography response in a patient with a proximal gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Sensitivity of (18F) 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography to identify primary early and advanced gastric carcinoma. FDG-PET: (18F) 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography; EGC: Early gastric cancer; AGC: Advanced gastric cancer; CI: Confidence interval.