Basic Research
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2005.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2005; 11(36): 5677-5684
Published online Sep 28, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i36.5677
Figure 1
Figure 1 Colonic MPO activity in TNBS and control rats. bP < 0.01 vs controls distal colon.
Figure 2
Figure 2 NOS activity in different colon segments in TNBS and control rats. bP < 0.01 vs uninflamed mid-colon.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Frequency of phasic contractions of mid-colon circular muscle in controls compared to DUMC of TNBS rats. aP < 0.05 vs controls, bP < 0.01 vs controls.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Force of phasic contractions of mid-colon circular muscle in controls compared to DUMC of TNBS rats. bP < 0.01 vs controls.
Figure 5
Figure 5 High [K+]0 induced contractile response of mid -colon circular muscle in controls compared to DUMC of TNBS rats. bP < 0.001 vs controls.
Figure 6
Figure 6 EFS evoked contraction of mid-colon circular muscle in controls compared to DUMC of TNBS rats. bP < 0.001 vs controls.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Pharmacological effects on EFS-evoked contractile responses recorded in the presence of L-NNA. bP < 0.001 vs controls.